death penalty news

September 16, 2004


JAPAN:

More business for the hangman

Japan is at it again. The announcement of two executions this week tells 
the world that the old, familiar ritual of the killing season is back with 
a vengeance.

The state hangman is quietly going about his paid business of exacting 
revenge on some of those who have been found guilty of murder by punishing 
them in like fashion. Make no mistake about it ? capital punishment is 
alive and well today under the direction of Mr Koizumi's coalition cabinet.

No doubt we will be told that public opinion strongly endorses such acts 
and you can bet your boots that the statistics are already in the works, 
just waiting to be trotted out down to the last decimal point. As if this 
proves anything except that many feel instinctively that it's the only 
tried and true way of avoiding chaos in society. It might certainly be an 
interesting experiment to discover if any announcement of a temporary 
abandonment of the death penalty would make the slightest difference in 
Japan's serious crime figures.

Equally predictably, official spokesmen will be getting ready with their 
prepared scripts to tell us that they, too, know that the nation needs to 
be protected against child killers, subway terrorists, arsonists, rapists 
and sword-wielding thugs fuelled on cocktails of booze and drugs. Again, 
this is obviously the case, but it hardly demonstrates that putting a noose 
around an individual's neck works as a deterrent against future criminal 
acts or does much beyond satisfying the emotions of those who want to see 
the perpetrators rot in hell.

Japan is one of a shrinking number of nations that appear to believe that 
capital punishment is required to maintain public order and is necessary 
because of the vehement insistence of domestic opinion. Not all Japanese 
politicians would agree, but clearly the present government is not about to 
halt executions.

It would rather not consider if the hangman's work achieves anything but 
revenge and possible solace for the victim's families and friends. For now 
we are not going to get much leadership in this area or have a grand debate 
on the subject. Support for capital punishment is too entrenched for 
counter voices to expect to make much impression on the cabinet.

It might, though, help the abolitionists' case if a degree of pressure on 
Japan's policies toward crime and punishment were applied from abroad. 
Unfortunately, the fact that so many states in the U.S. also conduct 
executions through a host of different procedures including the electric 
chair, lethal injection and the noose is certain to strengthen Japan's 
determination to maintain the status quo.

Given the pro-American direction of Japan's entire postwar foreign policy 
it is unlikely that the European Union's strong and vocal views against 
hanging will be able to influence Tokyo's position on capital punishment 
beyond causing popular resentment.

Similar calls by groups in Europe deploring the prevalence of capital 
punishment in the United States often result in this kind of backlash where 
one continent sees itself as "civilized" and berates the other as unworthy. 
Should the U.S. Supreme Court, however, eventually rule against the 
constitutionality of the death penalty on the grounds that it is a form of 
inherently cruel and unusual punishment, then there could be some grounds 
for hope that the issue might be reviewed.

Those in the human rights movement who want to scrap the rope and the 
trapdoor face enormous barriers. To explain that Japanese courts might 
mistakenly sentence the innocent to death for crimes committed by others or 
that some found guilty have been festering on death row for decades waiting 
for their walk to the gallows is no easy matter. Besides, the authorities 
are generally reckoned to get it right and any suspicions of foul-ups are 
best kept quiet even when the mental health of those on Death Row may be in 
doubt.

Reformers have no choice but to argue patiently and trust that some future 
justice minister will not only refuse to order executions on his or her 
watch, but ignite an open debate on capital punishment. Perhaps in the next 
generation the present process may yet end and the hangman might be 
silently pensioned off. His forced retirement can't come soon enough.

(source: Japan Today)

Reply via email to