death penalty news

October 12, 2004


JAPAN:

Capital questions

Japan's appetite for the death penalty is drawing criticism from its own 
legal commuity and international organisations, writes Justin McCurry

Sunday marked the World Day against the Death Penalty. Not surprisingly, it 
passed unnoticed in Japan - one of the safest, most peaceful societies on 
earth - but which nevertheless retains an appetite for executing its own 
citizens.

Although the number of executions remains small by the standards of China 
or the United States, opinion polls regularly show that the vast majority 
of Japanese people harbour few qualms about hanging the perpetrators of the 
most heinous crimes; men such as Mamoru Takuma, who was sent to the gallows 
last month for stabbing eight primary school children to death in 2001.

Although Amnesty International and other human rights groups protested 
against his swift execution - which came less than a year after his 
conviction was finalised and before he had explained his motives - for 
others it brought something resembling closure to one of most shocking 
crimes in postwar Japan.

Similar feelings surfaced when, earlier this year, a court sentenced to 
death Shoko Asahara, the bearded, half-blind leader of the Aum Supreme 
Truth doomsday cult, whose members killed 12 people by releasing sarin 
nerve gas on the Tokyo subway in March 1995.

Few will mourn the passing of the likes of Takuma, yet despite the public's 
appetite for swift, final retribution, Japan is coming under increasing 
pressure to question its unswerving faith in capital punishment.

Among those who are uncomfortable with Japan's status as one of only two G7 
members who still execute criminals - the other is the United States - is 
the country's own legal community.

Last week the Japan Federation of Bar Associations - the country's biggest 
lawyers' group - called on the government to suspend all executions and end 
the culture of secrecy that surrounds the final hours of some of the 
country's most despised individuals.

The lawyers, who had never discussed capital punishment at their annual 
human rights conference since it was first held in 1958, also urged the 
government to set up a commission to look at the long-term future of 
capital punishment.

In a resolution, the federation said that poor legal representation for 
defendants in murder cases could result in unsafe convictions. Their 
anxiety is well placed. As recently as the 1980s, four inmates were taken 
off death row after being acquitted in retrials.

There was concern, too, that even when dealing with similar cases, some 
courts had handed down life imprisonment while others opted for the death 
penalty - a decision that is entirely in the hands of the judge since there 
are no jury trials in Japan.

"The government should not execute inmates, at least until it drastically 
improves these serious defects," the resolution said.

The treatment of death row inmates has long been a target for critics of 
Japan's criminal justice system. Typically they spend years awaiting 
execution. When their moment of reckoning arrives, they are given between 
30 minutes and an hour's notice. They are not permitted to contact 
relatives or to make final appeals. Their families are informed afterwards 
by telephone and asked to collect the body.

The opacity of the entire procedure is such that, officially, the justice 
ministry announces only the number of executions, while refusing to 
disclose details.

The procedure is little short of farcical. The official announcement is 
merely a cue for reporters to call their sources at the ministry, who duly 
provide them with the names of the dead men (two or more executions are 
usually carried out in a single day, roughly twice a year) and reminders of 
the crimes that took them to the gallows.

Timing is everything. Takuma and another death row inmate, a 59-year-old 
former mafia boss who killed three other gangsters in 1988, were hanged 
during a parliamentary recess, thereby avoiding condemnation, and awkward 
questions, from anti-hanging MPs on the floor of the lower house.

A favoured alternative is late December, when most Japanese are more 
preoccupied with their plans for the New Year's holidays than with paying 
attention to the news.

But the stifling of intelligent discussion of Japan's "secret" executions 
is unlikely to last long.

A cross-party group of about 100 MPs have gone even further than their 
colleagues in the legal profession by calling for the abolition of the 
death penalty, to be preceded by a four-year moratorium.

Led by Shizuka Kamei, a senior figure in the ruling, and largely 
pro-hanging, Liberal Democratic party, the Japan Parliamentary League 
Against the Death Penalty is working on a bill that would replace 
executions with life imprisonment without parole.

International organisations, meanwhile, offer Japan frequent reminders that 
it is part of a shrinking group of countries, which persist with the death 
penalty.

As of last month, 118 countries, including Nepal and Cambodia, had 
abolished capital punishment, while 78 retained it. In South Korea, no 
executions have taken place since Kim Dae-jung took office in 1998, and 
abolition is nearing in Taiwan.

As a member of the hanging lobby, Japan - where there are currently 63 
people on death row - has drawn criticism from the United Nations and the 
European commission. The Council of Europe has threatened to temporarily 
withdraw Japan's observer status until it at least implements a moratorium 
on executions, as it did between November 1989 and March 1993.

Repeating that gesture would be more in keeping with the momentous changes 
taking place in other policy areas.

Tokyo's recent bid for permanent membership of the UN security council and 
its involvement in Iraq are taken by some as signs that, 60 years after the 
end of the war, Japan is becoming a "normal" member of the international 
community.

But according to the EU, the UN and a host of other respected 
organisations, normality, with the glaring - and shameful - exception of 
the United States, also means ending the state's right to kill its own 
citizens, no matter how abhorrent their crimes.

(source: Guardian)

Reply via email to