On 10 May 2005, 17:19, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just establish the non-free section and move everything over. If anyone > > complains then just drop the package they're complaining about. Of course, > > NO ONE is going to complain since they know we will "become" Debian soon > > anyway (and for all intents we ARE Debian - just not on their server), and > > they've already given Debian permission to distribute. For the rest of > > non-free, permission to distribute is not an issue, and not the reason > > they're in non-free to begin with. > > The pine author would for one thing. Just out of curiosity, are pine sources distributed in "official" Debian Sarge? (the usual yes/no reply will suffice :)) > In one point you are right though: > > NO ONE IS GOING TO CARE ABOUT OUR NON-FREE! None of us anyway. With > the exception of nvidia* package it seems. That is the only package > that users missed so far. http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers/nvidia-graphics-drivers_1.0.7174-3/nvidia-glx.copyright I'm not a lawyer, but it seems quite clear to me. Isn't it? Btw, when will come the time to check non-free will you please, pretty please, put an eye to lha package too? Thanks in advance :)) -- <@,@> Il corpo del povero cadrebbe subito in pezzi [`-'] se non fosse legato ben stretto dal filo dei sogni -"-"- --Anonimo indiano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]