At Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:58:42 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make > noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported > in future.
I think it would be a pity if we wouldn't support kirkwoord devices such as those QNAP NAS devices anymore. I've got a QNAP TS-221 that is less than two years old and it would be nice if it would continue to run the latest version of Debian, but I don't know how much work it would cost to continue to support armel for Stretch. Kind regards, Jeroen Dekkers