Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There's no reason to treat this as release-critical for a udeb; udebs
> are only used as part of the installer where conflicts with
> user-managed files are not possible.
Well, conflict with user files is not the only reason I think
that the FHS tries to reserve /usr/local for the local admin, but I
agree that my misgivings are more on principle than on any concrete
harm I can think of. It is still a must violation, could the severity
be reduced to important instead?
manoj
--
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
