Holger Wansing, le dim. 30 janv. 2022 13:42:10 +0100, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote (Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:23:25 > +0100): > > In general 3.69 -> 3.68+deb11u1 update looks wrong, it has to be > > increasing :)
Mmm, sorry, even if that's what caught my eye, this isn't an absolute rule. > Hmm, increasing is of course right. > However, I guessed this goes per distribution, so: > current version in stable is 3.68, that's why I chose 3.68deb11u1. > Looking at the version history in stable, that would be indeed an increase. > ? Yes, and that's usually what happens: we upload to stable some patched versions of what is already in stable. > So, if I understand that correctly: > - I do an upload to unstable now, which is then 3.69 Yes. > - Then I can upload to stable, which then gets 3.69deb11u1 > Would that be correct? It would have to be less that 3.69 actually, so that on upgrading to bookworm the package gets "upgraded" to 3.69. I guess best would be 3.69~deb11u1, to say that it's essentially 3.69, but before 3.69 from bookworm. Samuel