[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:54:31AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:02:44AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> | | | > I cannot find this information there, either.
> > > | Can I get more information on why this is a bug in mklibs?
> > > See bug 211092 ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211092 )
> > >
> > > | Does some library actually provide timeout_yet?
> > > | If so, can I please see readelf -s -W output of it?
> > >
> > > I don't care about a single accidentically missing symbol.
> >
> > I don't understand. Are you saying if a symbol is missing, mklibs
> > should ignore that and create a binary that cannot be executed?
>
> I'm only saying that it is a mklibs bug.
>
> Where the timeout_yet or whatever noweak symbol is, is not
> important(to me).
Then how do you know it is a bug in mklibs and it is not actually a
missing symbol?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
