Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Then how do you know it is a bug in mklibs and it is not actually a
> > missing symbol?
> 
> Which was the real reason it failed in every testcase I got my hand on
> so far. All of those suposedly mklibs weak symbols bugs disapeared
> when recompiling the faulty binaries against the proper versions of
> libraries so far.

If I read between the lines right, this time it was breakage in brltty
on sparc, and I've removed it from the pkg-lists for sparc now.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to