On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:17:45PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > Then how do you know it is a bug in mklibs and it is not actually a > > > > missing symbol? > > > > > > Which was the real reason it failed in every testcase I got my hand on > > > so far. All of those suposedly mklibs weak symbols bugs disapeared > > > when recompiling the faulty binaries against the proper versions of > > > libraries so far. > > > > If I read between the lines right, this time it was breakage in brltty > > on sparc, and I've removed it from the pkg-lists for sparc now. > > Does that mean we can close the bug?
Please see attached patch. > > -- > Falk Geert Stappers
diff -ur mklibs-0.1.12/debian/changelog mklibs-patched/debian/changelog
--- mklibs-0.1.12/debian/changelog 2003-08-28 12:18:10.000000000 +0000
+++ mklibs-patched/debian/changelog 2003-11-13 09:55:30.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+mklibs (0.1.12.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Geert Stappers
+ - Give tidy error on not found non-weak symbol;
+ not a backtrace dump (closes: #211092, #219928)
+
+ -- Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:36:48 +0000
+
mklibs (0.1.12) unstable; urgency=low
* Alastair McKinstry
diff -ur mklibs-0.1.12/mklibs.py mklibs-patched/mklibs.py
--- mklibs-0.1.12/mklibs.py 2003-08-28 12:19:28.000000000 +0000
+++ mklibs-patched/mklibs.py 2003-11-13 09:57:33.000000000 +0000
@@ -466,7 +466,8 @@
for (symbol, is_weak) in needed_symbols.elems():
if not symbol_provider.has_key(symbol):
if not is_weak:
- raise "No library provides non-weak " + symbol
+ print >> sys.stderr,"No library provides non-weak " + symbol
+ sys.exit(1)
else:
lib = symbol_provider[symbol]
library_symbols_used[lib].add(symbol)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
