On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 11:33:36PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:36:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > > > The 2004-04-04 installation is still ongoing, with 2004-04-03 I still
> > > > > had the bug #241228 ("You are attempting to install an initrd kernel
> > > > > image (version 2.4.25-powerpc-small. This will not work unless you
> > > > > have configured your boot loader to use initrd...) which I thought
> > > > > was fixed with
> > > > > base-installer_0.066_powerpc.changes ? I'll add info to bug#241228 if
> > > > > 2004-04-04 also shows this bug.
>
> this bug is gone, but I've got a new one, this time installing unstable as of
> now.
>
> german to english translation: "can't install selected kernel", alt-f3 shows
> unmet dependencies: initscripts: depends fileutils >=4.0l-8 and
Known pronlem, probably fixed soon, i tagged it d-i yesterday. It is :
#241570, but it is not yet fixed. Testing is ok though, so just chose
testing when asked.
> kernel-image-2.4.25-power-pmac: depnds kernel-modules-2.4.25-powerpc
> (=2.4.25-6)
Yeah, also something i have to look about, maybe it is not problematic
though, don't know. Seems like an apt/debootstrap problem.
> > Well, since you do basically a full net install, the .udebs will be
> > taken from the net, and thus 0.066 probably has not made it to testing.
> > Maybe we should ask it to be fast tracked or something.
>
> Since I know now that I rather should use unstable for tracking _those_ bugs
> it's okay for me. testing and unstable are useful for different things!
Yeah.
Friendly,
Svne Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
