Sven Luther wrote: > > How can it tell that base-installer is being treated differently > > than other packages? > > Because it is an .udeb, and is originating from the debian-installer > folk.
Right, but where do I see if it's an .udeb? Where is that information? The Sources and Packages files don't contain the extension. > Probably just using a list of packages which are in the power of the d-i > team would be enough, you could write the above stuff, and a warning > that this is a d-i package, and thus gets handled manually ? 79 source packages have [EMAIL PROTECTED] listed as maintainer. Are all those banned from testing at the moment, or only a subset of them? -- Björn
