2011/12/11 Arno Töll <deb...@toell.net>:
> Back then I assumed that was quite intentional as upgrading to a 8.3
> kernel solved the problem. That's why we added breaks conditions to the
> package back then. Aside of this problem there didn't seem to be a hard
> (i.e. API or ABI) incompatibility which would have caused a crash or so.

TTOMK all break conditions are in place, but these don't cover all
possible combinations presented by D-I.

The isinstallable script at least ought to be working.  Any idea
what's wrong with that?

2011/12/11 Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org>:
> Your .isinstallable script is right, but it's being ignored.  Maybe
> because zfsutils is considered a 'required' installer module, and not an
> optional user choice from the menu.  Instead, it's just using the latest
> available version from the install media.

zfsutils is not a required module, it's supposed to be optional (just
like partman-zfs).

-- 
Robert Millan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxn_og09vcdfe5gu2g3irq++0u0pgk8dmtsja9uk2_-...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to