2011/12/11 Arno Töll <deb...@toell.net>: > Back then I assumed that was quite intentional as upgrading to a 8.3 > kernel solved the problem. That's why we added breaks conditions to the > package back then. Aside of this problem there didn't seem to be a hard > (i.e. API or ABI) incompatibility which would have caused a crash or so.
TTOMK all break conditions are in place, but these don't cover all possible combinations presented by D-I. The isinstallable script at least ought to be working. Any idea what's wrong with that? 2011/12/11 Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org>: > Your .isinstallable script is right, but it's being ignored. Maybe > because zfsutils is considered a 'required' installer module, and not an > optional user choice from the menu. Instead, it's just using the latest > available version from the install media. zfsutils is not a required module, it's supposed to be optional (just like partman-zfs). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxn_og09vcdfe5gu2g3irq++0u0pgk8dmtsja9uk2_-...@mail.gmail.com