2011/12/12 Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org>: > Looks like zfsutils 8.3 still has Breaks in place for 8.1/8.2 kernels, > since 8.3~svn226546-3, so I guess it is safe to migrate to testing, and > bug #648744 is unnecessary?
This would force all ZFS users of kfreebsd 8.2 in Wheezy to upgrade to 9.0. I think we should wait for the release before doing this. OTOH if new installs are broken, that's a big problem too. > zfsutils-udeb doesn't use Breaks, because the 8.2 and 9.0 images are > must both be present, so... Yes. A runtime check is needed. > I just tried another install using partman-zfs 16 and kfreebsd-8, which > allows zpool/volumes (v15) to be created with zfsutils 8.3 and it > generates a zpool.cache, but partman is still not listing any volumes as > mentioned before. > > If that issue could be fixed somehow, [...] Maybe it can, but the ABI incompatibility is probably a much deeper problem than just ZVOL support. E.g. I wouldn't be surprised if "zpool status" reports wrong data. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxm8rzph9ghrmst1dyjns7ptczpspvw5tcciqgsqo9w...@mail.gmail.com
