On 22:08, Christoph Egger wrote: > Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: > > Please could you upload freebsd-smbfs (10.1~svn272500-1) next. > > Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> writes: > > and also freebsd-utils (10.1~svn272167-1) please (in any order). > > Both uploaded! > > That should be the most important ones right (apart from ufsutils maybee)?
Thank you, yes those are all that are needed right now, although soon there may be: * freebsd-buildutils, to add MK_HYPERV and ISTR something else * freebsd-utils (newer snapshot) * ufsutils These are very important to d-i, so I should build a d-i image with them and complete a test-install first. > Btw: should we remove fuse4bsd from unstable? fuse is now part of the > main kernel. Aha I was wondering about that; I'm not familiar with fuse, but seemed to remember the package was going away. A lot of packages still depend on that (empty) package: * avfs * bindfs * curlftpfs * encfs * exfat-fuse * fuse-convmvfs * fusedav * gphotofs * jmtpfs * mythtvfs * plptools * python-fuse * rofs * s3ql * sshfs so I think we must add a Provides: (and Conflicts:) fuse4bsd to kfreebsd-image-*? We should perhaps wait 10 days for 10.1 to migrate. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141005202057.ge21...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
