On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:42:54PM +0100, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
> Thanks for your advice. I'm working on a new version of the patch.
> In the meantime, what should I do with my already uploaded NMU (on
> mentors.debian.net). Maybe I should delete it just to be sure nobody
> will upload it ?

You can do that.

> I also noticed that init scripts ask for "dpkg-reconfigure package" to
> enable service start, which is disabled by default. I guess this was OK
> when debconf handles /etc/default/package content, but obviously it
> won't work anymore.
> I can change the init script to display another message.

This sounds like a documentation fix. Currently, this should be covered
by the freeze policy. So fixing it should be ok for now.

> Finally, I'm considering shipping /etc/default/ola which is not shipped
> currently, in the same way as /etc/default/ola-rdm-tests. It controls
> whether olad service is enabled or not.

This sounds like a functional change. While it looks like an
improvement, I do not yet see why this should be release critical. So
better skip this for the upload targeting jessie, but you can prepare a
separate .debdiff for Wouter to apply later if you like. (Better create
a new bug report at lower severity then.)

> And, last question, speaking about /etc/default files, I wonder which
> are the best practices:
> - name /etc/default/xxx file according to the init script which will use
> them
> - name /etc/default/xxx file according to the package which provide them
> 
> In my case, /etc/default/ola is provided by ola package but controls
> olad service. Same with /etc/default/ola-rdm-tests which is provided by
> eponym package to control rdm_test_server service.
> 
> All these would indeed increase the overall package quality, but I
> wonder if this is not a bit "out of scope" work considering Jessie freeze.

You are rightly wondering. These changes are likely not acceptable for
jessie.

It looks to me that you are looking a bit too far at the moment. This
bug was found using piuparts. After applying your initial .debdiff,
piuparts still rightfully complains (about other things). This is why I
asked you to reiterate. Nothing more.

Helmut


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to