Hello Helmut,

On 19/11/2014 07:41, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Jean Baptiste,
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:48:04PM +0100, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
> > Please find attached anew version for the patch.
>
> Thanks! I still have a question about it.
>
> >   - Provides missing /etc/default/ola from ola postinst script to allow
> >     olad service control in the same way rdm_test_server is
>
> I'm not sure why this last point qualifies as serious. I can see that it
> is an improvement, but it does not seem like the Debian policy requires
> /etc/default/something to be available as a means of control.

/etc/init.d/olad requires it, with a specific content, to start the service.
I added it so that users do not have to dig into init script to find
what to put into it.
I agree this is not a serious issue per se, but I felt like it was an
important one, and could be considered as a sort of documentation update.

> > - packages pass piuparts tests (I tested .changes file with
> > --no-upgrade-test since jessie package fails to install)
>
> I see that you are learning quickly. Thanks for highlighting the
> --no-upgrade-test switch.
>
> > I also documented verbosely changes in changelog as requested by [1]
>
> Excellent.
>
> > Please let me know wheter the work is satisfying or I need to
> iterate more.
>
> Apart from that one change where I don't understand why it is serious,
> your patch looks fine to me. Can you explain your reasoning here? Given
> the current freeze policy, important issues qualify as well until 5th of
> December, so arguing in favour of being important is enough.
>
> Should there arise a need to reiterate the patch for other reasons than
> those below, you can also fix these minor issues if you agree with them:
>  * s/seriouys/serious/ (changelog)
>  * "rm -rf /etc/ola" is dangerous and can potentially delete too much. I
>    suggest to use "rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty" if that makes the
>    package purge cleanly as well.
>  * I suggest to remove the summary comments from the new scripts to
>    reduce the size of your patch.

I'll provide a new version this morning with all changes you suggested.

Regards,
Jean Baptiste

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to