On Montag, 15. Dezember 2014, Alexander Zangerl wrote: > to be honest i don't think that's necessary: > . it's an annoyance-level issue, and doesn't affect the actual > operation too much
it is indeed somewhat annoying to already know in 2014 that out of the box I won't be able able to use best practices of 2014 in 2015. I don't think this is a "purely cosmetic issue"... Thanks for quickly fixing this in unstable anyway! :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
