On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 05:22:30PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I haven't looked at the code differences but my experience with
> openscad in wheey is that it is quite unreliable.  If the more recent
> ones are better, I think a backport would be a really good idea.

i've prepared a simple backport at [1] (ready with i386 and amd64
builds), but haven't had the chance to test it on a real machine (it
runs in a virtualized one, but the rendering tricks don't work, but
neither does the basic `opencsgexample` (from libopencsg-example), and
while that doesn't work, looking at openscad is futile most of the
time).

ian, could you give the package a try?

thanks
chrysn

[1] 
http://archive.amsuess.com/pool/main/o/openscad/openscad_2014.03+dfsg-1~bpo70+1.dsc

-- 
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
  -- Bene Gesserit axiom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to