Hallo,
* Guilhem Moulin [Thu, Sep 03 2015, 11:46:42AM]:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 at 22:20:03 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > $ gpg2 --homedir ~/.caff/gnupghome.alt --list-key
> > 7C3AB9CFD230BD30DD009C591E7091B1F14A64A2
> > gpg: checking the trustdb
> > gpg: keydb_get_keyblock failed: Legacy key
> > gpg: keydb_get_keyblock failed: Legacy key
> > gpg: keydb_get_keyblock failed: Legacy key
> > ... LOTS OF THEM ...
> > gpg: keydb_get_keyblock failed: Legacy key
> > gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
> > pub rsa4096/F14A64A2 2009-05-22 [expires: 2017-07-21]
> > uid [ unknown] Aaron M. Ucko <a...@alum.mit.edu>
> > uid [ unknown] Aaron M. Ucko <u...@debian.org>
> > uid [ unknown] [jpeg image of size 6064]
> > sub rsa4096/0ABAADF9 2009-05-22 [expires: 2017-07-21]
>
> What's the return value of that command btw? Does running the command a
> second time afterwards (with the GNUPGHOME left by the first execution)
> produce the same output and return value? Same question with
> ‘--trust-model=always’.
>
> Also, do you have any v3 keys in your keyring? What's the output of
>
> gpg --homedir ~/.caff/gnupghome.alt --with-fingerprint --with-fingerprint
> --with-colons --list-keys |
> grep -icE '^fpr:([^:]*:){8}[0-9A-F]{32}(:.*)?$'
>
> (you need to set ‘--with-fingerprint’ twice to list subkey fingerprints
> as well.)84 ;-) Have I mentioned that I installed signing-party a decade ago and used it rarelly, like once in 2-3 years? $ stat secring.gpg File: ‘secring.gpg’ ... Modify: 2006-05-06 13:19:30.000000000 +0200 Regards, Eduard.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
