El dj 14 de 07 de 2016 a les 07:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt va escriure: > For avoidance of doubt, "this user" appears to be you. I'm not sure > why you didn't just say that.
"This user" is me, Javier Serrano Polo. I was abstracting the problem from the specific user (me). El dj 14 de 07 de 2016 a les 10:08 +0200, Alexander Wirt va escriure: > I don't think that it is acceptable to write a mail in that way and to make > the impression that you are asking for someone else. Sorry for the confusion. Although my question was about generic "banned users", the example user is me. I hope you believe that I was not asking for someone else when the first link says "jav...@jasp.net", which is my address. > That, together with the reason for what you have been banned for (mails like > [1]) don't make me think that lifting the ban is a good idea. I would like to contextualize the message [1]. It was sent on the feast of the holy innocents [2] (it is in Spanish, I cannot find a good English resource). I sent that message. I was just trying to help and I thought I was doing the right thing. I am trying to move forward and continue helping. I can explain myself again and answer all your questions about what I did. But I did not open this bug report to talk about the past or to question the listmaster (Alex) that banned me; I understand that listmasters do their role as best as they can. I am here to talk about my future behavior. I made jokes that some people did not like. It is easy for me to not make any more jokes. I believe that banned users should have a way to redeem themselves and make positive contributions. IMHO, I think I deserve an opportunity; is there something I can do? > That is my personal oppinion as listmaster. Lets see what other listmaster > have to say. Alex, your opinion is important to me. I would like to know if I have convinced you that you can give me a chance. [2] https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%ADa_de_los_Santos_Inocentes#Conmemoraci.C3.B3n.2C_bromas_e_inocentadas
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature