* Daniele E. Domenichelli <ddomeniche...@drdanz.it> [2016-08-16 17:41]: > Is there a discussion upstream on some mailing list or some issue > tracker? Any suggestion about how to implement it?
http://discourse.ros.org/ or https://github.com/ros/catkin/issues > Also btw, I'm working on packaging YARP, it would be great to have it in > the debianscience/robotics packages... Yeah, sounds awesome :). > I'm attaching the patch for ros-common-msgs, I'm not sure about the > dependecies here. For example libactionlib-msgs-dev depends on > libstd-msgs-dev, probably because the messages in this library use > messages defined in ros-std-msgs. Therefore I added a dependency to > ros-std-msgs in the ros-actionlib-msgs package, since, in order to > generate bindings for some other language, this package must be > available. Anyway it is not strictly required as for a library that will > not work if the other is missing, so perhaps it should be recommended > instead? What do you think? I think depends is fine for now. We can still rethink it, if someone has different needs ;). > If this is ok for you, I will apply the same kind of patch to all the > other message packages and push the commit straight to the repositories, > otherwise let me know, and I will post the patches here one by one. Except the comment below, feel free to directly push your changes :). > diff --git a/debian/ros-sensor-msgs.install b/debian/ros-sensor-msgs.install > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..8be5479 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/debian/ros-sensor-msgs.install > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +usr/share/sensor_msgs/msg /usr/share/sensor_msgs contains srv/ as well. I would propose to put it into the msg package as well. Same hold true for some other packages. Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature