On 2017-11-06 12:11+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:52:43AM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: >> On 2017-11-06 11:17+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > >>> Why experimental and not unstable? Is the new version of the plugin >>> incompatible with Zotero 4? If yes, then that should be reflected in >>> dependencies (but then it's probably too early to upload it). >> >> It is not compatible with Zotero 4, as the Zotero part of the libreoffice >> extension is now plugged in zotero-standalone. The package just installs the >> libreoffice part. I've updated the control file to reflect this. OK, so we'll >> wait until having a zotero-standalone 5 package ready. I think having the new >> firefox extension ready should not be a blocker, though (in the case we don't >> have the tools ready to package it in time). > > Ok. > >> Concerning the zotero-standalone package, I guess it would be easier to also >> start from the beginning for the new package, as it was completely reworked. >> You still have no objection in me doing so? > > Please go ahead. Don't hesitate to revamp the packaging, what matters is to > get > something functional and easy to maintain. > > Thanks,
I misunderstood the 5.0 refactoring, zotero still has to be built from three repos, only the client part (https://github.com/zotero/zotero) was refactored to use npm/node (and so, needs js libs to get packaged). So, I guess the packaging repo should stay as it is for now, and be refactored if upstream decides to merge everything in a single repo. Could you please share your workflow for updating the package?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
