On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:27:33AM +0100, Frédéric Pierret wrote: > I fully agree on removing the RPM patch that causes all of our issues on > packages depending on it. If needed, I'm willing to be part of reviewing > what would be the impact of returning to a standard RPM package on Debian > and to help into solving those issues. Don't hesitate to ping me for that.
I'd be glad to review and sponsor uploads as well. "btw", we should update
dnf for bookworm too!
> With respect to the original issue, correct me if I'm wrong, but the severity
> of the bug has marked DNF to be removed.
while this is not wrong, it's also true that I lowered the severity of the
bug and thus the autoremoval procedure has been stopped.
> DNF works for at least simple actions
> like downloading packages from repositories. For example, we use it in Qubes
> OS
> in order to download updates for a Fedora system configuration from a Debian
> system.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Never waste a crisis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
