Followup-For: Bug #1064648 X-Debbugs-Cc: gus...@debian.org Hi Andreas - thanks for investigating!
> https://github.com/gusnan/allegro5/commit/e4369e13b1edb96b8ae4821c5363ac7b61002d3e Looks good - I noticed you fixed the typo already :) > https://github.com/gusnan/allegro5/commit/842af9e5d6cd9c8fd0d0d2f8095f872e7bd77cef Yep, also looks good to me. > Nah, my mistake, that didn't seem to fix the reproducibility - The > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH stuff seems to work, but the other one needs more > work. Huh, strange - what differences do you find? Two doc packages that I built a few moments ago using reprotest here are identical -- although I did have time variance disabled during that test. James