On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:30 +0000 James Addison <j...@jp-hosting.net> wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #1064648 > X-Debbugs-Cc: gus...@debian.org > > Hi Andreas - thanks for investigating! > > > https://github.com/gusnan/allegro5/commit/e4369e13b1edb96b8ae4821c5363ac7b61002d3e > > Looks good - I noticed you fixed the typo already :) > > > https://github.com/gusnan/allegro5/commit/842af9e5d6cd9c8fd0d0d2f8095f872e7bd77cef > > Yep, also looks good to me. > > > Nah, my mistake, that didn't seem to fix the reproducibility - The > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH stuff seems to work, but the other one needs more > > work. > > Huh, strange - what differences do you find? Two doc packages that I built a > few moments ago using reprotest here are identical -- although I did have time > variance disabled during that test. >
Now I managed to build it twice and debdiff those builds which showed no differences. So I assume the patches work fine - but we still have the time_t transition we will have to wait for before uploading. Meanwhile i will try to get the patches into Allegro upstream, and see what they say about them. /Andreas