On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:15:38 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 29 March 2007 at 19:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So, if you are using software that does not conform to a RFC
>> published in '96, that's your funeral. Don;t expect us to keep
> It worked in 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, ...
> It just so happens that you set it up such all but two [1] our MUAs
> could cope with it. Great design.
Hmm, I am no longer seeing anything new in here. Seems like
you are whinging that the ballots are not constrained to ascii, and
your broken MUA(s) can't deal with sending something conforming to a
10 year old RFC 2015.
Does that cover it?
> [1] Again pointing to lwn.net. I didn't try all of our available
> MUAs, but I had two fail on me, including one that worked for, hm, a
> decade?
Man, you insist on being spoon fed. So fine, here is a
list. Find one that suits you. Geez. Took me all or 2 minutes using
google.
http://www.bretschneidernet.de/tips/secmua.html
manoj
--
To save a single life is better than to build a seven story pagoda.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
