"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let me see... > > > star/star.1 > > Obviously using Joerg's version would very quickly get me a lot of bug > reports.
Why do you expect to get bugreports for a correct man page? Looking at the current Debian Bug list shows that all bug reports that are not related to packaging will go away if you upgrade to the current star-1.5 version. > > anyway (as suggested by Jörg regarding star_fat.c). > > I'd prefer to be really careful before applying anything that Joerg suggests. > His suggestions are sometimes very, very bad. My suggestions are always correct. The problem is that you did missunderstand things several times. I suspect that you did not try to understand how the compilation works and as a result created a buggy patch.... Please read this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310662 to understand that your incorrect source handling caused massive problems. Also note that some tim eago, I told you why a makefilesystem that includes a complete dependency list and that controls the calling of ./configure has problems to iplement make clean from the makefile system (except if there is a way to reverse the action order for a specific target). For this reason, all distributions come with a ".clean" shell script. In order to avoid such missunderstandings, it is good practice to foster good relations with the author and just ask in case things are not 100% clear. This is how Mika was able to get things running quickly ;-) Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
