Am Freitag, den 11.07.2008, 12:04 +1000 schrieb Drew Parsons: > So there it is, the bug is in etch octave2.9-info (2.9.9-8etch1). > Reassigning accordingly. I guess some logic should be added to lenny's > octave2.9-info dummy package to clear out any potential leftover > entries.
Rafael, can you take this? I'll try to come up with something, but I'm not sure I'll arrive at it before the freeze. > That is, use the install-info code related to "remove" in the > packages script (but apply the install-info remove during package > install, not removal!). > > Drew > > p.s. it's curious in this case that Thomas saw remnant 2.1 entries > in /usr/share/info/dir, not 2.9. Thomas, does that mean you had never > installed octave2.1-info 1:2.1.73-14 or later? Quite possible. We keep the 2.1 series in maintainance mode for quite some time. While I have 2.1 installed, the 2.1 info package is probably not installed in such a late version. Even then, I use it from within Octave and usually don't bother if the correct page doesn't come up: I then search within the info documentation. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]