On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:14:44AM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> this has nothing to do with copyright at all. the problem is that this
I somehow got a link to a page saying that there was a problem with
some packages claiming to have
Copyright
<You may copy according to GPL>
which is incorrect and should be
Copyright <author>
License:
<you may copy according to GPL>
Bug for the bugs-system.
Enhancement request for the bugs system:
Please send the URL of the "home page" of the bug in every
"changed" notification....
> package claims to be in the "standard" priority of Debian packages,
> while the archive is overriding what it says to set it's priority to
> "optional". the difference is that priority "standard" packages are
> installed by default, while priority "optional" and lower packages
> must be installed by the user. so the package needs to be changed to
> "optional".
Agreed.
Roger.
--
** r.e.wo...@bitwizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
