On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:14:44AM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > this has nothing to do with copyright at all. the problem is that this
I somehow got a link to a page saying that there was a problem with some packages claiming to have Copyright <You may copy according to GPL> which is incorrect and should be Copyright <author> License: <you may copy according to GPL> Bug for the bugs-system. Enhancement request for the bugs system: Please send the URL of the "home page" of the bug in every "changed" notification.... > package claims to be in the "standard" priority of Debian packages, > while the archive is overriding what it says to set it's priority to > "optional". the difference is that priority "standard" packages are > installed by default, while priority "optional" and lower packages > must be installed by the user. so the package needs to be changed to > "optional". Agreed. Roger. -- ** r.e.wo...@bitwizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org