-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:26:30PM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote: >This issue wasn't quite solved for me, but I'm no longer sure this is a >bug in netatalk. After further investigation, I discovered that the >bug manifested because of the following two situations >a) libltdl-dev provides libltdl3-dev and hence satisfies the build-dep >b) even if you install libltdl3-dev, you can still have the shiny >libtool 2.2 installed. > >Either of these conditions results in build failure. I was only able >to build the package successfully when I had libltdl3-dev and >libtool=1.5.26 installed. > >Whether this is a bug in netatalk, libtool, or in my layman's >understanding of build dependencies, I shall leave to wiser minds than >mine.
Please elaborate: What system are you using, that provides you the old libtool to install, concurrently with the new libltdl-dev? Yes, libltdl-dev provides libltdl3-dev, but you describred something else: you described how explicitly requesting one of them _uninstalled_ the other to replace it - and that does not sound like a single package providing the other virtually. So please elaborate on the system you are using. Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko59C4ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgrAQCfflfp245DDp7JGgcu6F69ba7d XDUAn2j129Olgn/1/zxHaMZ44iEzpkpW =6bGd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
