On 2009-12-20 08:43 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> cupt then fails with the same error message as in my original >> bugreport (with a slightly updated version number for one package). > > So what do you suggest? Adding Breaks instead of Conflicts?
Generally speaking, this would be preferable. > The facts are that we cannot have tex-common >= 2 with old TeX Live, > and at the same time new TeX Live with old tex-common, both are > combinations ripe for breakage. But texlive-common 2009-4 already depends on tex-common (>= 2.0) which rules out the second combination. So why does it need to conflict with older tex-common? Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
