On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 04:57:13, Ron wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:59:57AM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote: ... > > So for reliable support, the safer bet would be to wait for 1.2.4; until > > then, it's under development and may break in weird ways. > > Which is not to say this part might not be true. But only because of bugs > that purely exist in mumble alone, not any other cause. I personally don't > see how making it artificially hard for people to test it is going to make > it stop breaking "in weird ways" any sooner ... but ymmv. > > > Maybe people should look at the Mangler package and ventrilo if they really > just want something that actually works today and they aren't concerned > about the compromises they need to make to get that - which seems to be > the ongoing theme here. > > They managed to get that working with opus in just a couple of days, and > with none of the ED grade drama that we seem to be seeing here.
That cuts both ways. Okay... What do you believe the correct action to take for Mumble? What could you use help with? I've had a look at the mumble source package in git. On Sid, after doing a checkout of v1.2.3-348-g317f5a0-1 the package is not buildable right now because a dependency on libcelt-dev which has been removed. On Wheezy, after doing a checkout of v1.2.3-348-g317f5a0-1 I'm unable to get the package to build because there's no source tarball and debuild reports that it can't build source format 3.0 (quilt) if the source tarball is missing. Do you have the source tarball for 1.2.3-348-g317f5a0 at a web accessible location somewhere? -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
