On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 07:31 +0000, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > On 07/02/2023 03:20, Diane Trout wrote: > > What's your test environment like? > > Salsa CI. > > > I don't think head is hugely different from what was released in - > > 1. > > > > The diff looks like Andreas adjusted the dask dependency version, > > configured a salsa CI run, and added some upstream metadata files > > That sounds like you're not looking at my branch at all. As > previously > stated, that's > https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/dask.distributed/-/tree/fix1030096 > (It's in a fork because I can't push to debian-python.) > > See earlier in this bug for which test failures still remain.
I merged in most of Rebecca's changes via git cherry pick, though I slightly edited the changelog. (making most entries a bullet point instead of subheadings of the one line I left out). I think I got the code to detect if IPv6 is available to work correctly so I could set the DISABLE_IPV6 environment variable that dask.distrubted supports. I went with skipping the 32bit tests instead of xfailed because I don't think they can work as written since I really think they're making really large memory requests that can't ever succeed on 32bit. You did a lot of work on trying to get the flaky tests to work more reliably, and all that's included. Well except for the apply a patch and then revert it. All the merges are pushed to salsa debian/master. They also passed on my local build host running i386. Diane
