On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 21:21 +0000, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > > On 09/02/2023 17:07, Diane Trout wrote: > > Would it make sense to drop those errors back to warnings, and do > > you > > know enough about the setup.cfg language to do it quickly? > > > > Plausibly yes but I don't actually know, and remove the 'error' line > at > setup.cfg:60.
My current frustrated idea is to do what's going on in d/rules and skip the isinstalled tests. My local build is running now, and I was probably thinking of pushing a proposed -3 to salsa in an hour or so > > > I went ahead and requested another run for the failed amd64 run and > > left the passing arm64 run alone. > > That worked, but armel (test_steal_twice), armhf (something outright > crashing) and s390x (lots) all failed. Aren't those all still on -1? I only see amd64 and arm64 having run 2022.12.1+ds1-2 At https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dask.distributed/ > > The place to ask is debian-release; no comment on the likely result. > I'll try to ask. Diane
