On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:13 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Just because you don’t understand that sentence doesn’t mean you can use
> it to justify whatever convoluted position of yours.
I wonder who really doesn't understand here...

> An operating system is universal if it can be used for all purposes.
> An operating system that supports several kernels and init systems, but
> all incompletely, letting the user choose between different ways of
> failing to boot, is not universal. It is irrelevant to any serious use
> case.
... since which king is then,... who decides which way/init
system/kernel/etc... is the "right", the universal, for all people?


Cheers,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to