On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 16:00:04 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vikki Roemer) wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 07:59:07PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 01:17, John Holroyd wrote: > > > Form yourself a LUG and teach these lost souls the truth of St. Ignucius > > > Bible and the Glory of Emacs. ;) > > > > Why isn't there a religion of nano? I want to worship nano, dammit!! > > Yeah! Nano and XEmacs forever! :) > > Nano is great on the console, and XEmacs is the best editor (IMHO) for > X (and for programming). OTOH, vi serves no good purpose > anywhere. IMHO. *grin* > I prefer vim-gtk for x > -- > Vikki Roemer Homepage: http://www.2khiway.net/users/vroemer > Registered Linux user #2880021 http://counter.li.org/ > "Just because you're not paranoid, that doesn't mean they're not out > to get you." (ripped from someone's slashdot .sig) > PGP fingerprint: 0A3E 0AE4 CCD9 FF31 B4BB C859 2DE1 B1D8 5CE0 1578 > Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu/ > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.12 > GAT d-(?) s: a--- C++++(++) UL++++ P+>++++ L+++>++++ E>++ W++ N+ o? > K- w--() O? M? V?(-) PS+(+++) PE++(+++) Y+ PGP++ t+@ 5 X-() > R*(?) tv-- b+++(++) DI+ D--(?) G e-(*)>+++++ h! r-- x? > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > >
-- Julen Landa Alustiza mundurat.net eko administraria [EMAIL PROTECTED]
