On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 04:21 AM, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 13:00, Vikki Roemer wrote:On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 07:59:07PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 01:17, John Holroyd wrote:Form yourself a LUG and teach these lost souls the truth of St. Ignucius
Bible and the Glory of Emacs. ;)
Why isn't there a religion of nano? I want to worship nano, dammit!!
Yeah! Nano and XEmacs forever! :)
Nano is great on the console, and XEmacs is the best editor (IMHO) for X (and for programming). OTOH, vi serves no good purpose anywhere. IMHO. *grin*
I like gedit for quick edit jobs in X (along the lines of jove or nano on the console), and jEdit for longer, more involved editing (most notably, programming bigger than quick hacks).
I personally prefer BBEdit. (/me waits as everyone checks the X-Mailer header) But short a Quartz working environment I default to vi.
-- Paul Baker
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
GPG Key: http://homepage.mac.com/pauljbaker/public.asc
