>>>> "TB" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] TB> The current bug (94684) he said "I can do nothing if upstream author TB> changes their API". Well, this has many problems: TB> 1) Upstream author didn't change an API, they changed a direct user TB> issue. False. TB> 2) He can do something: a clean upgrade solution could be provided, TB> either in sawfish, or in gnome-terminal. sawfish-ui TB> 3) He can report the problem to the gnome maintainers and mark the bug TB> forwarded. Apparently you don't understand. Read my lips ((c) G. Bush) I'll *never* change the upstream API, I'll *never* ask the upstream author to change that. TB> I'm perfectly happy for him to just do (3). But what he wants to do TB> instead is declare real bugs non-bugs, on the grounds that he "can do TB> nothing". If he can't even forward bugs upstream, there is a serious TB> problem. *You* are a serious problem. If you don't want to change your configuration each time you did a apt-get upgrade, then install potato. testing/unstable is for real men (tm). TB> When he said "I can do nothing" he closed the bug. I replied "yes you TB> can do something" and reopened it, and he elected to mark it wontfix. TB> Now, wontfix is for specific reasons, and "I don't want to bother TB> forwarding the bug upstream" is just not an adequate reason. This is my last post about this flamewar. Maybe I'll reply to constructive post. Christian