On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:29:02AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively > > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload > > and dput? > > IMHO two tools with the same functionality are > 1. confusing for users > 2. waste of time for developers. They should spend their time > to make one better tool instead of two good tools.
The implementation language really does make a difference in the case of dupload and dput, since it affects their configuration languages. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]