On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:29:04AM +0000, Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:40:47 +0100:
> >  I am happy to take it.  But a question: with the more actively
> >  maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> >  and dput?
> >  
> *Ugh* Why are those nifty Perl scripts going to be replaced by Python
> stuff?
> 
> (Don't tell me someone's working on a Python debhelper rewrite...)

(define-rule 'binary
             ('binary-indep 'binary-arch))

(define-rule 'binary-arch
             ()
             (deb:test-dir)
             (deb:install-docs)
             (deb:install-examples "src/test1.cc" "src/test2.cc")
             (deb:install-menu)
             (deb:install-manpages)
             (deb:install-changelogs "ChangeLog")
             (deb:link)
             (deb:strip)
             (deb:compress)
             (deb:fixperms)
             (deb:installdeb)
             (deb:shlibdeps)
             (deb:gencontrol)
             (deb:md5sums)
             (deb:builddeb))

  (just kidding >=) )

  Daniel

-- 
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------\
|                      A conclusion is the place                              |
|                      where you got tired of thinking.                       |
\------- Listener-supported public radio -- NPR -- http://www.npr.org --------/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to