On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:29:04AM +0000, Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:40:47 +0100: > > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively > > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload > > and dput? > > > *Ugh* Why are those nifty Perl scripts going to be replaced by Python > stuff? > > (Don't tell me someone's working on a Python debhelper rewrite...)
(define-rule 'binary ('binary-indep 'binary-arch)) (define-rule 'binary-arch () (deb:test-dir) (deb:install-docs) (deb:install-examples "src/test1.cc" "src/test2.cc") (deb:install-menu) (deb:install-manpages) (deb:install-changelogs "ChangeLog") (deb:link) (deb:strip) (deb:compress) (deb:fixperms) (deb:installdeb) (deb:shlibdeps) (deb:gencontrol) (deb:md5sums) (deb:builddeb)) (just kidding >=) ) Daniel -- /-------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------\ | A conclusion is the place | | where you got tired of thinking. | \------- Listener-supported public radio -- NPR -- http://www.npr.org --------/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]