On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:46:48AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > Internal examination. How about talking about those tons of orphaned > > packages that noone uses rather that discussing about whether we have > > to keep one out of two small tools which have both many users? > > An excellent point. We *should* be more aggressive about dumping things > no one wants to maintain. So why did you attack someone who raised a > question about one particular package? The question was answered, move
You got me wrong. I talked about packages noone uses, not about packages noone wants to maintain, this is quite different. On the one side, there are packages that noone maintains and that noone cares about their removal. On the other side, there are unmaintained packages that have a lot of users. I'm not in favour of removing the latter. > on. No one's preventing anyone from doing anything, just asking > questions. Alright. Let's forget about this. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
