On Tue, 13 May 2003, Martin Quinson wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:42:16AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > > > If you really believe that the apache description should be improved than > > you file a bug against apache asking to changing layout, proposing the > > better one so that everyone can be alligned to it. > > If I understand well, you are bored because you think that the layout used > in french could be good in all languages, but the french translators sort of > kept it for themselves.
No, I am not bored. People in some msgs wrote that the french layout is better. I am not against the fact that it can be better. Just use the right way so that everyone can benefit in a similar way. > > But we didn't do that because we don't think that the french typographical > rules should be used in all languages, as well as we think that the english > typographical rules do not apply in French. > > > > We are performing a lot of reviews to ensure that the quality of the > > > translation is good. 3 translators were agreed to use this translation. > > > > We did not, i will repeat this until the end of the world, discuss the > > quality of the contents. We are discussing the layout. > > No, not exactly. We are not discussing esthetical layout here. ok, my fault here that i was missing the "esthetical". > This layout in french is not only esthetical, it must be so because of > typographical rules[1]. That's why we didn't think that all languages must > follow the same rules. In written french, the typographical rules have > almost the same impact than gramatical ones. > > But feel free to adapt this new layout to the original text if you want > to. Only, don't try to prevent us to follow the rules in our language. I don't want to prevent you to use your language like i wouldn't like the otherw ay around. Is there any way to be closer to the original esthetical layout? feel free to submit a bug report to change it globally ;) Fabio -- Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol "We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html