-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-08-20 11:47, Isaac To wrote: > >>>>> "cobaco" == cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > cobaco> kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any > cobaco> chance we'll wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't > cobaco> apply again immediately after release? > > But does the first few paragraphs of RM's original message exactly trying > to convey the message that "if it is not considered stable for long enough, > don't make it into stable"? If so, something to be released during the > original target release date doesn't seem to stand even slight chance!
<quote>Basically, it's the difference between having a sysadmin spending fifteen minutes every day or week tweaking your server to keep it running, or having a sysadmin come in for a week once a year to do a major upgrade.</quote> Note that the RM was talking about servers there, while kde is end-user software, big difference IMHO. Taking into account that kde isn't server-software and that kde won't do release if there are major bugs left I don't think stability should be a problem in this case. Anyhow, just think it would be nice to avoid all the reviews going "kde not up to date" for a change. - -- Cheers, cobaco /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / No proprietary formats in attachments without request X i.e. *NO* WORD, POWERPOINT or EXCEL documents / \ Respect Open Standards http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/no-word/attach.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Q0lL5ihPJ4ZiSrsRAlPkAJ9rX5SIwtYaGORH6fBDc76CbqyD5QCgixHn NmN1H3kSNWFFz7L2EPYWblc= =QMK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----