On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:04:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:57:32PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > These arguments are good, but... > > > > All packages which use this library depend on t1lib1. Of course, I can > > provide dummy t1lib1 package which depends on libt1-1 but I do not like > > this idea. > > I strongly urge you to overcome that dislike. IMO a package should > never disappear across a Debian release unless the functionality has > gone missing.
Agreed, so why rename it at all? (ie why t1lib -> libt1 if the dummy package is always going to be required anyway). > What's wrong with libt1-dev? Do you expect to have to support > development against multiple versions of t1lib? Apparently so. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>