On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:48:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > If you're renaming them anyway, why not follow Policy 8.1 and > > s/t1lib/libt1-/ (yielding libt1-1, etc.)?
> Yes, I thought about it. But there is no strict rule in Policy, just > recommendation. There are many other packages which do not conform to 8.1, > like: e2fslibs, svgalib, zlib, imlib, aalib, beecrypt, slang, cracklib... > Should I go on? For the record, I intend to change binary package names for svgalib, after sarge or once I package 1.9.x for experimental.... regards, guillem