On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:20:36PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:22:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:09:27PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > > I changed the naming scheme. All binary packages contain version in its > > > name, i.e.: t1lib-dev is now named t1lib1-dev. Of course old packages are > > Hmm. Why? > Incompatibility in API. Software which want to use t1lib 5.x needs changes > in source code. > > > It seems quite common to provide libxyz-dev which always matches the > > latest libxyzN package, even when libxyz1 becomes libxyz2 etc. > So, for now there is t1lib-dev which depends on t1lib1-dev. Any chages after > sarge release (didn't I write it earlier?). > > > It also means that if package X doesn't require any particular version, > You now know this is a false assumption.
OK, that makes sense. Thanks. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
