Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Scripsit Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The point is that I want to massage some parts of the configuration > > and not others. I want the others to continue to get updated by the > > normal package installation process. > > So is the whole thing essentially a workaround for dpkg's current > lack of good conffile update management, or would you still prefer the > separate files way if dpkg magically gained a well-tested and stable > conflict resolution scheme with bells, whistles, and 3-way merges?
Um, no, I don't think I said that. When I say, "this is an important thing that X provides", you cannot go and assume that I mean "this is the only reason to like X." Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
