-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For $DEITY's sake. Will you please understand that the Ubuntu folks >> totally failed to inform their fellows about what was going on ? And >> at the time, there was no Canonical website, no Ubuntu website. Only a >> handful of patches up on no-name-yet. > > At the same time, neither the company name nor name of the distribution > had been decided! So there could hardly have been websites for things > that didn't actually exist. That's what I wrote. I've been told "look at the Ubuntu website", and I'll do, promised. But I already figured out most of what I needed to know. > The front page of www.no-name-yet.com clearly stated we were a group of > Debian Developers working on a derived distribution, and so did the > announcement sent to debian-devel. > > There was nothing else to report. I feel something, some explanation, was missing, and in fact, still is. I just can't tell you what. JB. - -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCNwdOzWFP1/XWUWkRAoGJAJ44lX1xFg/RkAKmC9poRtSG6P3d0gCggOdE fOqfnpbrvncCYXUsglC3WcU= =rK09 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
