On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > With the new proposal of de facto dropping m68k support, I'm this -><- > > > close > > > to recommend to Roman, that he better should invest his time into other > > > projects, because Debian wouldn't appreciate his work to bring up another > > > public m68k machine. > > Notice that m68k doesn't actively participate in the kernel-team, and > > package > > their stuff in their own corner though, which may be the reason for this > > perceived problem. > > Has the kernel team made any advances to the m68k kernel team for a closer > cooperation? Or did they just yelled "Hey! We are now taking over the kernel > development, no matter if more capable people are outside of the project!"?
I sent an email to cts, and discussed some with him. I don't remember the details, and i didn't approach this again when i meet him in oldenbourg. Participating in the kernel-team mostly means moving the kernel-image|patch|whatever packages into the kernel svn archive though, and maybe this was the stopping step. That said, once we move to one kernel package only for all arches (for a given version), more active participation is needed. Individual patchset and config file handling will still be in the hands of the individual arch maintainers. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
