On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:29:42AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Is this wanted? > > This may not be wanted, but what is your alternative?
Well, it's not that we don't want gcc's documentation to be moved to non-free; rather, we don't want gcc's documentation to *be* non-free. The moving to non-free is just a side-effect; Adrian seems to be saying that we should eliminate the side-effect and ignore the core problem. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
